Tuesday, January 17, 2012

BASF Moves GM Plant Research From Europe To US

GMO is not about making plants that produce more, or are resistant to cold or heat or drought.

Presently they are about resistance to insects, better weed management practices, and virus resistance, and they work.

It is the control of the food supply, that is what it is about.

You have no idea what genetic engineering is, do you? It is a technique. It doesn't want to do anything. Sure, you could say that a company wants to get larger market share, but that would be like saying that cooking is all about control because McDonald's does it.

Ask any Biologist, and they will tell you, genetically creating strains of identical plant lines to maximize a trait is a truly dangerous thing to do.

Funny, because that's exactly what many biologists working in plant science are trying to do with particular traits. That's what we've been doing for years with conventional breeding, or did you think all those plump grains and fat fruits were natural? This is not intrinsically different than altering traits via GE. And as a matter of fact, I have asked biologists about this very subject. University professors in genetics, biochemistry, plant biology, and agriculture. Guess how many of them opposed genetic engineering? None.

Whenever you take and engineer biological entities such as plants, that are gentically identical and create entire artificial eco systems that have low diversity, or in the case of GMO, _NO_ diversity, all sorts of catastrophic destruction can happen to the population.

That doesn't even make sense. Yes, lack of biodiversity is bad. Genetic engineering however is a way of improving a plant, not a system of agriculture. What you are saying is like saying that modifying cars with spinning rims means that there will only be one car on the market. Furthermore, even with GE crops, they breed the trait into numerous different lines of the crop.

Whether it be a GERM, a BUG or BAD WEATHER, having a food supply that is genetically diverse and NOT engineered is the safest and will produce the most food, consistently over a wide variety of environmental conditions.

Biodiversity is what you grow. genetic engineering is a way to improve it. That's a false dichotomy that makes absolutely no sense and could just as easily be applied to conventional breeding.

GMO has got to be the worst possible idea of all time.

Tell that to the papaya farmers in Hawaii who would no longer be papaya farmers without the GE Rainbow papaya. Tell that to the farmers in India who stole Bt cotton seeds from test fields. Tell that to the farmers all across America, Canada, Brazil, and Argentina who willingly choose to buy GE seed every year.

It isn't by accident you know, they will not put GMO labels on food. They know it is not safe, and they do not want you to know about it.

They?

GMO also is causing massive extinction rates in our grain crops from gene contamination. If this isn't stopped, there won't be any grain species left that are safe to eat.

Really? Care to explain in detail how a single new transgene could possibly do that? Because it sounds like you just made that up.

It sounds like you know nothing about biology or agriculture, but you've got conspiracies down.

Source: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotScience/~3/0xggqn-_Y-k/basf-moves-gm-plant-research-from-europe-to-us

fox 4 adam levine vs fashion show 2011 victoria secret fashion show beverly hills hotel beverly hills hotel tori spelling

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.